Thursday, 12 November 2009

I've got a little list...

When I'm not writing clunky blog entries or procrastinating, I read. Since procrastination takes up most of my time, I read far less than I would like too and less than I should. The usual result of this is spectacular multibooking. This week I have been blending Edmund Crispin with Terry Pratchett, which is good for the vocabulary if nothing else. I haven't dared add any battlefield archaeology to the mix. One of the less mindboggling side effects of this habit is that I always have a mental list of Books I Really Must Read When I Have Time. Everyone has a list like this. It's driven entirely by guilt and peer pressure. Wolf Hall? Oh yes, but there were about three hundred people on the waiting list at the library last time I checked. All three volumes of Simon Schama's History of Britain? Gathering dust on the bookcase for the past six years or so. A Clockwork Orange? Read an extract in the paper this morning, thought "oh, that looks good, I'll have to reserve that". The complete works of Christopher Marlowe? Got to read them for work but I fear I'll struggle. (I don't buy the Marlowe-was-Shakespeare theory on the entirely unscientific grounds that Dr Faustus bored me and the Shakespeare I've read so far never has.) The Lost Symbol? No, no and thrice no. Even for a giggle. The worst aspect of this condition is that the list gets longer all the time. I'll be wading through a social history of the personal column thinking "I haven't read Jane Eyre in ages". (A sub-condition is the buying of books I've borrowed and enjoyed, the theory being that I liked them so much I'll re-read them later. They gather dust with all the others.) Why do I do it? Life is finite. There is only a fixed number of books I can read. Why must I try to cram in more than I can possibly get through in the allotted time? Denial complicates matters still further. I know I won't read six books during my week off work but I still bring them back from the library anyway. I've read one, which has brought a small glow of achievement. I'd planned to read part of another today but somehow ended up ironing instead and then realised I hadn't finished the paper. The simplest thing would be to admit that I don't have time and send the contents of my overstuffed bookcase to charity shops, relying instead purely on the charms of the local library service, but that would be a betrayal of the avid reader I used to be. There's nothing for it. I am going to have to work through all the books on my list. One at a time...

2 comments:

rose22 said...

Hmm. I'm similar.
Working on theory that books do furnish a room, and thus excusing the piles of pages that I can't bear to be parted from that litter our house.
Insisting on big bookcases in the new house, but husband resisting my request to have floor to ceiling shelving on the grounds that we can't possibly need that many books. Would believe it if he:
i)ever actually read any of the ones he owns in preference to newspapers and magazines,
ii) hadn't take the same Jack Kerouac and Rekyavik 101 with him on every holiday since I've known him, and
iii) didn't unpack the boxes I put together to go the the charity shop, extracting anything that's his on the grounds that he "really likes that one"...

Lexi said...

Perhaps the Kindle will be the answer, when it is cheaper.

I've nominated you in my blog for a sort of blogging ponzi scheme: see http://lexirevellian.blogspot.com/2009/11/modest-blogging-award-which-involves.html

(All publicity is good publicity, no?)